The Real Problem
Many traders review outcomes without reviewing the decision process that generated them. This leads to action plans based on surface-level impressions rather than repeatable diagnostics.
Without explicit review structure, deviations are either overemphasized or ignored depending on emotional state and recent result sequence.
As a consequence, correction cycles become inconsistent: too many variables change at once, and causal interpretation collapses.
A formal review framework solves this by anchoring every correction to documented evidence, fixed scoring logic, and controlled validation windows.